QUESTION: Reference the caption for file marssoil.gif under Current Science Data. The chart in this file compares Viking soil with Sojourner soil. The caption concludes that "Mars has a globally homogeneous soil layer probably the result of many years of mixing by the winds". In Pathfinder photos I've noticed that in those areas where the surface dust has been disturbed or removed, the underlying soil is darker and the the layer of surface dust appears to be very thin. Wouldn't this suggest that the soil is not necessarily homogeneous? Or is the surface dust simply a lighter (less heavy) component of the surface soil? ANSWER from Mary Urquhart on September 13, 1997: I haven't found the caption you refer to (it is no longer under Current Science Data). The difficulty may be that the homogeneous soil layer mentioned in the caption you quote refers to the drift or windblown material and not the Pathfinder site "native" soil materials. Regardless, please remember that analysis that you quote (as all analysis to date has been) was preliminary. Some of the soil materials at the Pathfinder site are certainly not identical to the materials at the Viking landing site. The caption for a comparison of Pathfinder APXS soil analysis results with results from Viking (hap_2.jpg) states: "Although the first APXS soil analysis (A-2) was reported to be almost identical to Viking soils, subsequent analyses demonstrate some variability and a few significant differences from Viking analyses. Specifically, soils at the Pathfinder site generally have higher aluminum and magnesium, and lower iron, chlorine, and sulfur." The soil at the Pathfinder landing site may be vertically inhomogeneous (layered) even if the windblown materials have been well mixed. The dust probably does represent a lighter (or uncemented) layer of soil that can be mixed by wind. Mary Urquhart Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics University of Colorado at Boulder